Capital FX Review: No License and Withdrawal Complaints
Capital Fx shows no valid regulation on WikiFX, and reviews cite withdrawal problems and steep fees. Read the warning signs on the WikiFX App.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Several users of the trading platform Scope Market (RS Global Ltd.) have reported serious issues with their accounts, including large amounts of money being taken without warning and permanent suspensions without clear explanation

Several users of the trading platform Scope Market (RS Global Ltd.) have reported serious issues with their accounts, including large amounts of money being taken without warning and permanent suspensions without clear explanation. The users are now calling for action from financial regulators and demanding that their money be returned.
The main complaint comes from Malaysian trader Norazlin Binti Mohd Zin, who says that she and two others, Al Azran Bin Zurizal and Wong Khai Victor, were affected in the same way. According to Norazlin, the problems began after she met with a company representative named Eka Ferdadi in Malaysia in September 2024. Ferdadi, who travelled from Cyprus, promoted Scope Market as a safe and trustworthy platform, encouraging her and others to open accounts and start trading.


Norazlin opened her account on 27 November 2024 and began trading shortly after. She says she followed all the platform‘s rules and regularly checked with Ferdadi to make sure her trading was within the platform’s guidelines. She received confirmation that everything was in order.
However, on 10 March 2025, Norazlin and the other two traders received an email from Scope Market saying their accounts had been suspended due to “suspected fraud.” This came as a surprise, as there had been no earlier warning or message about any problems with their accounts.

When the users tried to contact Scope Market for more information, they say the companys replies were unclear and did not include any proof of wrongdoing. Despite sending identity documents and other information to confirm who they were, the users claim Scope Market refused to explain the reasons behind the suspensions.
Then, on 12 March 2025, just two days after the accounts were suspended, Scope Market reportedly withdrew large amounts of money from each of the affected accounts:


After the withdrawals, all three users say they were completely locked out of their accounts. They could no longer see their trading history or check what happened to their money. Repeated emails asking for a refund or an explanation have gone unanswered.
The users are now asking regulators to step in. They want an investigation into Scope Markets actions, a full refund of the money taken, and rules put in place to stop this from happening to others. They have said they plan to bring their case to the Financial Ombudsman, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), and other financial watchdogs. They also plan to share their story on social media to warn other investors.
The complaint includes emails, account records, and identity documents. So far, Scope Market has not made any public comment on the matter.
WikiFX will continue to follow this story and provide updates as more information becomes available.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Capital Fx shows no valid regulation on WikiFX, and reviews cite withdrawal problems and steep fees. Read the warning signs on the WikiFX App.

Criticism has emerged within the cryptocurrency industry following reports alleging that Kampanat Wimonnot, a former Web3 fund executive, was involved in a fraudulent investment scheme involving fake pre-token deals linked to well-known blockchain projects. According to the allegations, the scheme used documents and information that were claimed to be fabricated in order to create the appearance of legitimacy and attract investors. At least 24 victims from multiple countries have reportedly been affected, with losses ranging from tens of thousands of dollars to more than US$1 million. The incident highlights the risks associated with private allocation crypto deals and underscores the importance for investors to verify information directly with the originating project before making any investment decisions.

Are your funds stuck with OspreyFX, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker? Does your trade execution price always remain far away from the requested price due to heavy slippage? Does the broker, contrary to its claims of low-cost trading experience, widen spreads to inflate your costs? Like others, do you always witness constant fund withdrawal denials by the broker? In this OspreyFX review article, we have investigated complaints against the forex broker. Read on!

When choosing a broker, how you move capital in and out of your account is extremely important. Investing funds and withdrawing them out are not just simple tasks - they show whether a broker is trustworthy and works properly. It doesn't matter if putting money in is easy if you can't get your money back out. This guide explains Xlibre deposit and withdrawal methods, but we also talk about managing risks and being careful. Sometimes it's easy to deposit funds in an account, but very hard to take out your profits and original capital. Our main goal is to keep your funds safe by giving you a clear analysis of how these processes work and, more importantly, what risks they involve.