CySEC Put Cyprus Brokers on Notice in Last Week’s Conflict-of-Interest Sweep
CySEC has told Cyprus brokers to prepare for on-site inspections and desk reviews focused on conflicts of interest and retail product sales.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:LHCM enters an FCA voluntary agreement, pausing new clients and deposits, while its role as Exante’s UK operating entity draws closer attention from WikiFX.

LHCM (also known as London HCM or LHCM Ltd) has recently drawn attention after announcing a voluntary arrangement with the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), raising concerns among traders about its current operating status, funding activity, and broader risk exposure.
Combined with a low safety score on WikiFX and its operational connection with Exante, LHCM now presents several risk signals that traders should carefully evaluate before engaging with the platform.

LHCM has publicly stated that it has reached a voluntary agreement with the FCA, under which the company will temporarily stop accepting new clients and suspend deposit activities from existing clients starting December 22, 2025.
This type of voluntary arrangement typically indicates that a firm is under regulatory review or operational adjustment, and it directly affects the brokers ability to expand or continue normal business operations.
While this does not automatically imply wrongdoing, it is a serious regulatory development that directly impacts client onboarding and fund inflows. For traders, any suspension of deposit activity is a critical operational signal, especially when combined with other risk indicators.
According to WikiFX data, LHCM currently holds a very low overall safety score, reflecting weaknesses across several key evaluation categories such as risk control and operational transparency.
Although LHCM is registered in the UK and previously held regulatory approval, WikiFXs scoring system weighs not only licensing, but also business behavior, platform stability, and exposure history.

WikiFX also flags areas related to risk control and software reliability, which are critical factors when assessing a brokers ability to safeguard client funds and maintain fair trading conditions.
For traders, a low WikiFX score does not rely on marketing claims, but on verifiable data, regulatory scope, and reported platform behavior.
More detailed broker information can be found here:
https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/5928160122.html
LHCM Ltd. is the UK-regulated operating entity of the Exante Group, not a standalone brokerage. It is authorised by the FCA to provide UK clients with access to the EXANTE trading platform, using the same proprietary system and market infrastructure operated by Exantes global entities.
Under this structure, client trading, order execution, and account operations on LHCM are conducted within Exantes platform environment rather than through systems developed independently by LHCM.

User feedback records aggregated by WikiFX also include reports related to Exante platform usage, with recurring references to withdrawal delays and account access issues. These submissions suggest that some operational concerns experienced on Exantes systems may be reflected in the user experience of LHCM clients as well.


As a result, any operational or procedural issues affecting Exantes trading systems may also directly impact LHCM clients, particularly in areas such as fund access and account controls.
Individually, regulatory adjustments, low third-party safety scores, or platform partnerships may not always be decisive. However, when these factors appear together, they form a broader pattern of elevated risk:
LHCMs voluntary agreement with the FCA restricts normal business operations.
WikiFX scoring highlights weaknesses in risk control and stability.
The brokers trading infrastructure depends on Exante, which itself has attracted a notable volume of negative user exposure related to withdrawals and internal handling.
For traders, these overlapping signals significantly increase uncertainty around fund security, operational continuity, and dispute resolution effectiveness.
WikiFX is a global broker information platform focused on regulatory verification, risk alerts, and exposure tracking. By aggregating official license data, operational indicators, and verified user submissions, WikiFX helps traders identify potential risks before opening accounts or depositing funds.
Checking regulatory scope, monitoring exposure history, and understanding platform relationships are essential steps in managing trading risk—especially when brokers undergo regulatory adjustments or operate through third-party infrastructures.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

CySEC has told Cyprus brokers to prepare for on-site inspections and desk reviews focused on conflicts of interest and retail product sales.

Read this amana review covering broker regulation, user complaints, and withdrawal risk signals on WikiFX before you deposit. Check the facts now.

Capital Fx shows no valid regulation on WikiFX, and reviews cite withdrawal problems and steep fees. Read the warning signs on the WikiFX App.

Are your funds stuck with OspreyFX, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker? Does your trade execution price always remain far away from the requested price due to heavy slippage? Does the broker, contrary to its claims of low-cost trading experience, widen spreads to inflate your costs? Like others, do you always witness constant fund withdrawal denials by the broker? In this OspreyFX review article, we have investigated complaints against the forex broker. Read on!